 |
|
 |
CIS Market Utility Types
By Greg Galluzzi, President (October 2003)
The CIS industry consists of thousands of utilities organized primarily
by services provided and ownership. A utility is identified as one of
the following types.
Public Power or Government Owned Utility
These include: Municipally-owned electric systems, Federal agencies,
and State projects and Public Power Districts.
Investor Owned
Utilities organized as tax-paying businesses usually financed by the
sale of securities in the free market and whose properties are managed
by representatives regularly elected by their shareholders. Investor-owned
utilities, which may be owned by an individual proprietor or a small
group of people, are usually corporations owned by the general public.
There are 3,152 U.S. based electric utilities with 2,009 structured
as publicly owned, 894 structured as cooperatives, 240 as investor owned,
and 9 as federal power agencies. However, if the number of customers
served by utility type is examined, it becomes very clear that although
there are only 240 investor owned utilities they serve 73.3 percent
or over 92 million end use customers with electricity.
The 2,009 public owned utilities serve 14.8 percent or 18.6 million
end use electric customers. The 894 cooperates serve 11.9 percent or
nearly 15 million end use electric customers. Federal Power Agencies
serve 34,648 end use customers.

Public Water / Wastewater Utility
Publicly owned utilities which provide water, wastewater, solid waste,
drainage and other services. The utility may be a City, County, Municipal
Utility District, etc.
Cooperative Owned
A group of persons who have organized a joint venture for the purpose
of supplying electric energy to a specified area. Such ventures are
generally exempt from the Federal Income Tax Laws. Most cooperatives
have been financed by the Rural Utilities Service.
Retailer / Marketer / Energy Service Provider
An entity which functions as a marketer or broker of power not engaged
in the generation, transmission or distribution of electricity. The
top 20 power marketers make up 75 percent of sales to retail customers.
CIS Market Activity Levels
In 20articles/03, TMG Consulting believes the market will reflect
the following activity.
Investor Owned
Purchase decisions begin to pick-up in late 20articles/03 increasing
through the end of 2004. Retail markets will continue to be delayed
while the wholesale market gets organized and structured. A 2 year period
exists from initial interest through purchase—late in 20articles/03
vendors should see increased activity. Don't plan on significant sales
until the utility becomes certain of retail market opening and rules
of service, which could be years away. There should be a three year
period of significant activity from 2005 through 2007 which will begin
to slow in 2008 with market activity continuing at moderate levels as
utilities continue to implement extended or phase 2 components. Significant
interest in ASP solutions will be tempered by market realities.
Public Owned
The top 100 public utilities will re-evaluate CIS systems with their
decision to enter retail markets. Many who “opt-in” to an
already opened deregulated market will find their systems will not operate
within a deregulated environment and will be forced to enter the market
to either buy a new system, additional components, or outsource. Activity
between 2005 and 2007 will be moderate. According to industry analysts,
public power will lose customers if they enter deregulated retail markets.
If true, city councils and boards may sell the utility or at least focus
on minimizing costs and maximizing operating efficiency. CIS purchase
decisions will occur at very low levels beginning in 2008.
Cooperative Owned
Like the public utility the majority of cooperatives will not
enter the deregulated retail markets. However, pent up demand may drive
CIS purchase decisions. Moderate levels of activity will continue through
2007. This activity will fall to low levels beginning in 2008.
Energy Marketer
Similar to the investor-owned utility, significant levels of activity
will begin in 2005 and continue at a brisk pace for three years ending
in 2007. Activity will continue at moderate levels after 2008 as additional
core and extended capabilities are implemented. However, due to stalled
deregulation, the number of energy marketers in the industry will be
low.
Water Utility. The high level of activity occurring within the water
industry has already begun to decrease. By the end of 20articles/03
activity levels will decrease as these utilities focus on completing
installation work and implementing phase 2 core and extended components.
Beginning in 2006 water utilities will revert to the low levels of activity
characteristic of the 1980's and 1990's.
CIS Market Potential Sales Revenue
If all of the customers in the utility market were converted
to a new CIS, nearly $48 billion would be spent on hardware, software,
services, payroll costs, etc. as presented in the following table.
| CORE |
COMPONENT |
PER UNIT |
TOTAL COST |
% |
| |
| External |
Hardware |
$7.00 |
$3,052,000,000 |
6% |
| |
Software |
$5.00 |
$2,180,000,000 |
5% |
| |
Services |
$18.00 |
$7,848,000,000 |
16% |
| |
Subtotal |
$30.00 |
$13,080,000,000 |
27% |
| |
| Internal |
Staff |
$14.00 |
$6,104,000,000 |
13% |
| |
Out-of-Pocket |
$16.00 |
$6,976,000,000 |
13% |
| |
Subtotal |
$30.00 |
$13,080,000,000 |
27% |
| |
| External |
Services + |
$30.00 |
$13,080,000,000 |
27% |
| |
Products + |
$20.00 |
$8,720,000,000 |
18% |
| |
Subtotal |
$50.00 |
$21,800,000,000 |
45% |
| |
| GRAND TOTAL |
$110.00 |
$47,960,000,000 |
100% |
The diagram presents the cost components. Vendors providing a core CIS
solution are limited to 21 percent of the total pie excluding hardware
at 6 percent. Approximately 45 percent of the revenue is associated with
extended products and services.
TMG offers the following recommendations.
- Only 5 percent of potential CIS revenue is associated with software
sales. This low percentage is restrictive and should discourage CIS
vendors from focusing only on software sales and product management.
Instead, software vendors should continue to develop their service business.
- Only a few CIS vendors are reselling hardware. TMG recommends avoiding
the hardware business as many public utilities purchase from state contracts.
- Vendors should focus on assisting utilities with their activities
to increase service revenue, e.g. additional training, business process
redesign, project management, conversion, data cleansing, etc.
- Vendors should develop extended capabilities and include in the software
contract even though the work may occur in subsequent phases.
- Vendors should work deals with third party implementers for a piece
of the service fee.
Greg Galluzzi is the President and Senior Consultant with
TMG Consulting. Greg has 25 years of information technology, and consulting,
experience across 200 CIS projects. experience across 200 CIS projects.
Greg can be reached at gregg@tmgconsutling.com.
|
|
 |